This is not cool.
I do not consider myself an artist- but I am friends with many whose income comes directly from their ability to draw or their musical skills. I see outrage when a political party uses a song without permission by the artist who performed it without asking permission first and, rightly, the artist has the right to that rage since usually, when their work is used in such a fashion: as a symbol of a movement, person, or organization- that the ideals of the organization who co-opted the work is in direct opposition to the beliefs of the artist in question.
This too, is especially true for those in graphic design and the tattoo industry. Clients ask for a specific work to meet their idea, the artist agrees or declines to create the work the client requests, and if there is mutual agreement, the art is created for use as a…
View original post 685 more words